User Acceptance terhadap SIPADU-STIS Menggunakan Teori Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) dan Metode Analisis Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34123/jurnalasks.v7i1.121Keywords:
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Structural EquationModeling (SEM), SIPADU-STIS, user acceptance, perceived usefulnessAbstract
The successful of developing and implementation of information sistem is dependon the user acceptance. SIPADU-STIS is an academic information system that support academic’s bisnis process. Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) will be employed for analysing of SIPADU-STIS system. Validation of TAM model will estimate using Structural Equation Model (SEM). The model shows that SIPADU-STIS has a high user’s acceptance .
Downloads
References
Anggorowati, M.A. (2013). Pengembangan Metode Estimasi SEM Non-Standar PadaAnalisis Technology Acceptance Model [Disertasi]. Surabaya: Institut Teknologi
Sepuluh November
Azwar, Saifuddin. (1997). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Chuttur. M.Y. (2009). Overview Of The Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, Developments And Future Directions. Indiana University, USA. Sprouts:Working
paper on information systems.
Cochran, G., William. (1991). Teknik Penarikan Sampel Jilid III. Jakarta: UI Press.
Davis, F. (1989), Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease Of Use And User Acceptance Of Information Technology. MIS Quartely, Vol.13 (3),hal. 319-339.
Davis, F. (1993). User Acceptance Of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions. Int. J. Man Machine Studies, Vol.38 (3),hal. 475-87.
Diponegoro, Ahmad Muhammad. (2005). Validitas Konstruk Skala Afek. Humanitas:
Indonesian Psychological Journal, 2 No.1 Januari 2005: 64-74.
Djaali, & Pudji. (2008). Pengukuran dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Ghozali, Imam. (2008). Structural Equation Modeling Teori Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan Program Lisrel 8.80 + CD. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.
Hair, J.F. Jr., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1998). MultivariateData Analysis, (5th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hair, J.F. Jr.,Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., & Black, W.C. (2010). Multivariate Data
Analysis, (7th Edition). Prentice Hall.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 user’s reference guide. Uppsala, Sweden: Scientific Software International.
Kang, Sungmin. (1998). Information Technology Acceptance : Evolving With The Changes In The Network Environment Center For Information System Management Department Of Management Science And Information System
Graduate School Of Business. The University of Texas at Austin. IEEE. 118
Maruyama, G., (1997). Basics Of Structural Equation Modeling. 1st Edn., Sage
Publications, Thousand Oaks, ISBN-10: 0803974086, pp: 311.
Mike, Rosebush. (2011). Validition of the Character Mosaic Report. Technical Report.
Singarimbun, Masri & Sofyan Effendi. (1989). Metode Penelitian Survei, LP3ES.
Jakarta.
Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Takdir. (2011). SIPADU STIS versi Juli 2011. 12 Juli 2014.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F.D., (2000). A Theoretical Extension Of The Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science. Vol. 46,
No. 2, pp. 186-204.
Venkatesh, V. & H. Bala, (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 And A Research Agenda On Interventions. Decision Sci., 39: 273-315.
Venkatesh, V., & Michael G. Moris, (2000), Why on?t Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and
Usage Behavior,MIS Quarterly.
Wibisono, Dermawan. (2003). Riset Bisnis: Panduan bagi Praktisi dan Akademisi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Wijanto, Setyo Hari. (2008). Structural Equation Modeling dengan Lisrel 8.8: Konsep dan Tutorial. Jakarta: Graha Ilmu.