Analisis Kinerja, Kualitas Data, dan Usability pada Penggunaan CAPI untuk Kegiatan Sensus/Survey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34123/jurnalasks.v10i1.198Keywords:
CAPI, Sensus, Survei, Pengumpulan DataAbstract
Pengumpulan data merupakan suatu tahapan pada Sensus/Survey yang sangat menentukan keberhasilan Sensus/Survey. Prosesnya yang memakan waktu lama akan mengakibatkan data yang disajikan tidak relevan dengan kondisi pada saat pelaksanaan. Dengan Computer-Assisted Personal Interview (CAPI), proses entri data dapat dilakukan pada saat proses interview berlangsung. Hal ini mempersingkat tahapan pengumpulan data hingga data tersedia pada sistem komputer dan siap untuk dianalisis. Pada penelitian ini, indikator-indikator penting penentu keberhasilan penerapan CAPI, yakni kinerja, kualitas data, dan usability diukur untuk melihat sejauh mana CAPI memberikan penyempurnaan pada pengumpulan data. Penelitian ini memberikan rekomendasi, baik dari segi konsep, maupun teknis, mengenai desain CAPI untuk kegiatan sensus/survey.
Downloads
References
Baker, R.P., Bradburn, N., and Johnson, R. (1994): CAPI: An Experimental Evaluation. In American Statistical Association (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sec- tion on Survey Research Methods, 851-855.
Baker, R. P., Bradburn, N. M., & Johnson, R. A. (1995). Computer-assisted personal interviewing: an experimental evaluation of data quality and cost. Journal of Official Statistics, 11(4), 413-431.
Bernabe-Ortiz, A., Curioso, W. H., Gonzales, M. A., Evangelista, W., Castagnetto, J. M., Carcamo, C. P., ... & Holmes, K. K. (2008). Handheld computers for self-administered sensitive data collection: a comparative study in Peru. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 8(1), 11.
Bishop, Yvonne M., Warren L. Buckler, Robert P. Parker, and Charles E. Caudill. 1990. “Computer Assisted Survey Information Collection.” (April).
Caviglia-harris, Jill et al. 2012. “Improving Household Surveys Through Computer-Assisted Data Collection: Use of Touch-Screen Laptops in Challenging Environments.”
Chalmers, Neil, and Joachim De Weerdt. 2010. “A Comparison of CAPI and PAPI through a Randomized Field Experiment.” (November):1–56.
Childs, J. H., & Landreth, A. (2006). Analyzing interviewer/respondent interactions while using a mobile computer-assisted personal interview device. Field methods, 18(3), 335-351.
Couper, Mick P., and Geraldine Burt. 1989. “THE IMPACT OF COMPUTER-ASSISTED PERSONAL INTERVIEWING (CAPI) ON INTERVIEWER PERFORMANCE: THE CPS EXPERIENCE.” 189–93.
Couper, M.P. and Groves, R.M. (1992): Interviewer reactions to alternative hardware for computer-assisted personal interviewing. Journal of Official Sta- tistics, 8, 201-210.
Couper, M. P. (2000). Usability evaluation of computer-assisted survey instruments. Social Science Computer Review, 18(4), 384-396.
De Leeuw, E. D. 1993. “Data Quality in Mail, Telephone, and Face to Face surveys”.
Fuchs, Marek, Mick P. Couper, and Sue Ellen Hansen. 2000. “Technology Effects?: Interview Duration in CAPI and Paper and Pencil Surveys.”
Lynn, P., & Purdon, S. (1994). Time-series and lap-tops: the change to computer-assisted interviewing. INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL ATTITUDES, 141-141.
Manners, Tony. 1990. “THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER ASSISTED INTERVIEWING ( CAI ) FOR HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS?: THE CASE OF THE BRITISH LABOUR FORCE SURVEY.”
Martin, J. (1993, October). PAPI to CAPI: the OPCS experience. In Essays on Blaise 1993: Proceedings of the Second International Blaise Users Conference, Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, London (pp. 96-117).
Matheson, Jil. 1991. “APPLICATION OF COMPUTER ASSISTED INTERVIEWING TO THE FAMILY EXPENDITURE SURVEY.” (February):1–48.
Müller, S., & Kesselmann, P. (1996). Akzeptanz von computergestützten Erhebungsverfahren. Ein empirischer Vergleich mit der traditionellen Fragebogentechnik. Marketing ZFP, 18(3), 191-202.
Randolph, Justus J., Marjo Virnes, Ilkka Jormanainen, and Pasi J. Eronen. 2006. “The Effects of a Computer-Assisted Interview Tool on Data Quality.” 9:195–205.
Sainsbury, Roy, John Ditch, and Sandra Hutton. 1993. “Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing.” (3).
Sainsbury, Roy, John Ditch, and Sandra Hutton. 1995. “The Effect of Computer-Assisted Interviewing on Data Quality: A Review.”
Shaw, Arthur, Lena Nguyen, and Ulrike Nischan. 2011. “Comparative Assessment of Software Programs for the Development of Computer-Assisted Personal Interview ( CAPI ) Applications.” (July).
Slaughter, Laura, Ben Harper, and Kent Norman. 1994. “Assessing the Equivalence of the Paper and On-Line Formats of the QUIS 5 . 5.”
Wensing, Fred, Jane Barresi, David Finlay, and Australian Bureau. 2003. “Developing an Optimal Screen Layout for CAI.” 63–76.