Dimension Reduction of Socioeconomic Factors in Deforestation Analysis in Indonesia Using Sparse PCA

Authors

  • Mitha Rabiyatul Nufus Forest Management Study Program, Department of Forestry, Kupang State Polytechnic of Agriculture, Kupang, Indonesia
  • Jenike Gracelya Noke Fisheries Agribusiness Study Program, Department of Fisheries and Marine Affairs, Kupang State Polytechnic of Agriculture, Kupang, Indonesia
  • Eusabius Paul Pega Horticultural Industrial Technology Study Program, Department of Food Crops and Horticulture, Kupang State Polytechnic of Agriculture, Kupang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34123/jurnalasks.v18i1.954

Keywords:

Deforestation, Dimensionality Reduction, Indonesia, Socioeconomic Indicators, Sparce Principal Component Analysis, Spatial Analysis

Abstract

Introduction/Main Objectives: Deforestation remains a major environmental challenge in Indonesia under diverse socio-economic conditions. This study applies Sparse Principal Component Analysis (SPCA) to identify the key socio-economic variables associated with deforestation patterns. Background Problems: Analyses of deforestation drivers often involve numerous correlated variables, leading to multicollinearity and making interpretation difficult. Therefore, an approach is needed to reduce data dimensionality while retaining the most relevant information. Novelty: This study employs SPCA to simultaneously perform dimensionality reduction and variable selection, producing a more interpretable framework for identifying socio-economic factors related to deforestation at the provincial level in Indonesia. Research Methods: Provincial-level socio-economic data from Statistics Indonesia were analyzed using SPCA to address multicollinearity and derive interpretable components. Spatial autocorrelation was assessed using Moran’s I. Finding/Results: SPCA reduced the variables into two interpretable components and identified six key contributing variables while excluding three with limited influence. Moran’s I values for the first (0.402) and second (0.258) sparse principal components indicated significant positive spatial clustering of provinces with similar deforestation-related characteristics. Research Limitations: The analysis is limited to provincial-level secondary data and may not fully capture local-scale variations or all determinants of deforestation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Leon, G. Cornejo, M. Calderón, E. González-Carrión, and H. Florez, “Effect of Deforestation on Climate Change: A Co-Integration and Causality Approach with Time Series,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 18, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811303.

H. M. Njoya, K. Hounkpati, K. Adjonou, K. Kokou, S. Sieber, and K. Löhr, “Socioeconomic analysis of deforestation and economically sustainable farming systems to foster forest landscape restoration in central Togo,” Front. Sustain. Food Syst, vol. 8, pp. 1-16, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1466008.

M. R. Nufus, R. Silaban, E. P. Pega, J. G. Noke, E. F. Karo-Karo, “Analisis nonparametrik laju deforestasi dengan model spline truncated berbasis faktor sosial ekonomi di Indonesia,” Wahana Forestra: Jurnal Kehutanan, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 124-134, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.31849/f3xg9n24.

Global Forest Watch, Retrieved from Indonesia Deforestation Rates: https://www.globalforestwatch.org/dashboards/country/IDN/?category=forest-change&lang=id&location=WyJjb3VudHJ5IiwiSUROIl0%3D&map=eyJjZW50ZXIiOnsibGF0IjotMi41Nzg0NTMwNjA1NjA0NjU2LCJsbmciOjExOC4wMTUxNTU3ODk5ODA5Mn0sInpvb20iOjIuNDMxNTQ5Njk3NjM2NDc1LCJjYW5Cb3, March. 2026.

A. Tyukavina, P. Potapov, M. C. Hansen, A. H. Pickens, S. V. Stehman, S. Turubanova, D. Parker, V. Zalles, A. Lima, I. Kommareddy, X. P. Song, L. Wang, and N. Harris, “Global Trends of Forest Loss Due to Fire From 2001 to 2019,” Front. Remote Sens, vol. 3, pp. 1-20, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2022.825190.

N. Shrestha, “Detecting Multicollinearity in Regression Analysis,” American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 39-42, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.12691/ajams-8-2-1.

H. I. Dertli, D. B. Hayes, and T. G. Zorn, “Effects of multicollinearity and data granularity on regression models of stream temperature,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 639, pp. 1-11, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131572.

B. B. Alkan and I. Ünaldi, “Robust sparse principal component analysis: situation of full sparseness,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 5-20, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/jamsi-2022-0001.

A. Chowdhury, A. Bose, S. Zhou, D. P. Woodruff, and P. Drineas, “A Fast, Provably Accurate Approximation Algorithm for Sparse Principal Component Analysis Reveals Human Genetic Variation Across the World,” Annual International Conference, RECOMB, pp. 86-106, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04749-7_6.

S. Park, E. Ceulemeans, and K. Van Deun, “Acritical assessment of sparse PCA (research): why (one should acknowledgethat) weights are notloadings,” Behaviour Research Methods, vol. 56, pp. 1413-1432, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02099-0.

H. Zou, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani, “Sparse Principal Component Analysis,” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics,” vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 265-286, 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1198/106186006X113430.

Q. Ke, S. Xu, S. Zong, X. Jiang, and S. Li, “Spatiotemporal dynamics and driving mechanisms of agricultural expansion into forests in Southeast Asia,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 393, pp. 1-15, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127030.

C. A. Asrat, Makkulau, and I. Yahya, “Perbandingan Metode Principal Component Analysis (PCA) dan Partial Least Square (PLS) dalam Penanganan Multikolinearitas pada Kasus Kemiskinan di Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara Tahun 2023,” Arus Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 68-82, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.57250/ajst.v3i1.1164.

C.-C. Jeng, “Why a Variance Inflation Factor of 10 Is Not an Ideal Cutoff for Multicollinearity Diagnostics,” Journal of Educational Research and Development, vol. 57, no. 2, pp.67-92, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.53106/199044282023105702004.

F. Chen, and K. Rohe, “A New Basis for Sparse Principal Component Analysis,” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 421-434, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2023.2256502.

S. Widiarto, R. Fauziyah, T. P. Astari, N. L. Juliasih, S. Hadi, L. Zakaria, and I. Saputra, “Authentication of Processed Beef Sausage Products Using Chemometric Analysis Based on FTIR Spectrophotometry Data,” Jurnal Kimia Sains dan Aplikasi, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 39-46, 2025.

I. T. Jolliffe and J. Cadima, “Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 374, no. 2065, Art. no. 20150202, 2016. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2015.0202.

J. Purwanto, T. Rusolono, and L. B. Prasetyo, "Spatial model of deforestation in Kalimantan from 2000 to 2013," Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 110–118, 2015, doi: 10.7226/jtfm.21.3.110.

M. F. Barri et al., Papua Bioregion: The Forest and Its People. Bogor, Indonesia: Forest Watch Indonesia, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://fwi.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/FWI-2019-Papua-Bioregion-The-Forest-and-Its-People.pdf

H. Zou, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani, “Sparse Principal Component Analysis,” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 265–286, 2006, doi: 10.1198/106186006X113430

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Nufus, M. R., Noke, J. G., & Pega, E. P. (2026). Dimension Reduction of Socioeconomic Factors in Deforestation Analysis in Indonesia Using Sparse PCA. Jurnal Aplikasi Statistika & Komputasi Statistik, 18(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.34123/jurnalasks.v18i1.954